point

 

 Remember me

Register  |   Lost password?

 

Next Dates: - Introduction to QuantLib Development with Luigi Ballabio, September 2 - 4, 2013 - £1700

 

Patrick Burns's Blog

US market portrait 2013 week 11

March 16, 2013 Comments (0)

US large cap market returns. Fine print The data are from Yahoo Almost all of the S&P 500 stocks are used (as implied by Wikipedia on 2013 January 5 — see the R commands to scrape the data) The initial post was “Replacing market indices” The R code is in marketportrait_funs.R

US market portrait 2013 week 10

March 9, 2013 Comments (0)

US large cap market returns. Fine print The data are from Yahoo Almost all of the S&P 500 stocks are used (as implied by Wikipedia on 2013 January 5 — see the R commands to scrape the data) The initial post was “Replacing market indices” The R code is in marketportrait_funs.R

US market portrait 2013 week 9

March 2, 2013 Comments (0)

US large cap market returns. Fine print The data are from Yahoo Almost all of the S&P 500 stocks are used (as implied by Wikipedia on 2013 January 5 — see the R commands to scrape the data) The initial post was “Replacing market indices” The R code is in marketportrait_funs.R

US market portrait 2013 week 8

February 23, 2013 Comments (0)

US large cap market returns. Fine print The data are from Yahoo Almost all of the S&P 500 stocks are used (as implied by Wikipedia on 2013 January 5 — see the R commands to scrape the data) The initial post was “Replacing market indices” The R code is in marketportrait_funs.R

Simple tests of predicted returns

February 18, 2013 Comments (0)

Some ways to explore how good a method of predicting returns is. Data and model The universe is 443 large cap US stocks that have data back to the beginning of 2004.  The daily (adjusted) close was used. The model that is used as an example is the default signal from the MACD function of the TTR package in R.  As we’ll see, this works sometimes, and sometimes not.  The signal would need to be scaled to really be expected returns, but the scaling won’t matter for our tests....

US market portrait 2013 week 6

February 9, 2013 Comments (0)

US large cap market returns. Fine print The data are from Yahoo Almost all of the S&P 500 stocks are used (as implied by Wikipedia on 2013 January 5 — see the R commands to scrape the data) The initial post was “Replacing market indices” The R code is in marketportrait_funs.R

The components garch model in the rugarch package

January 28, 2013 Comments (0)

How to fit and use the components model. Previously Related posts are: A practical introduction to garch modeling Variability of garch estimates garch estimation on impossibly long series Variance targeting in garch estimation The model The components model (created by Engle and Lee) generally works better than the more common garch(1,1) model.  Some hints about why it is better are in “3 realms of garch modelling”. Figure 1 shows predictions of volatility for each day 20 days...

A sister blog is born

January 24, 2013 Comments (0)

The Burns Statistics blog had it’s first real post today (about the corner function in the BurStMisc package).  The blog will talk mainly about the R language, statistics and programming — it will not have the financial focus of the Portfolio Probe blog. The posts on the Burns Statistics blog will be announced on Twitter via @burnsstat.

US market portrait 2013 week 3

January 19, 2013 Comments (0)

US large cap market returns. Fine print The data are from Yahoo Almost all of the S&P 500 stocks are used (as implied by Wikipedia on 2013 January 5 — see the R commands to scrape the data) The initial post was “Replacing market indices” The R code is in marketportrait_funs.R

The incoherence of risk coherence

January 14, 2013 Comments (0)

What coherent risk measures are, why some people think coherence is important, and why I don’t. The rules A risk measure is considered to be coherent if it satisfies some mathematical properties.  They are formulated in various ways — here is one set: (monotonicity) If the value of portfolio X is always bigger than the value of portfolio Y, then the risk of X is less than or equal to the risk of Y. (cash invariance) The risk of the portfolio that is X without some amount of cash is...