Since the financial crash in 2008, economic science and the economic
profession are under siege. Critics point fingers at ivory tower economists,
devoted to the construction of unfalsifiable models based on unrealistic
assumptions in purely theoretical basis. Economies are complex man-made systems
where organisms and markets interact according to motivations and principles
not entirely understood yet. Neo-classical economics is agnostic about the
neural mechanisms that underlie the valuation of choices and decision making.
The increasing dissatisfaction with the postulates of traditional economics
i.e. perfectly rational agents, interacting through efficient markets in the
search of equilibrium, has created new incentives for different approcahes in
economics. Behavioral economics [2],[9] builds on cognitive and emotional
models of agents, Neuroeconomics addresses the neurobiological basis of
valuation of choices [8],[7] or Evolutionary economics [3], [5], [4],[1],[6]
which strives for a new understanding of the economy as a complex evolutionary
system, composed of agents that adapt to endogenous patterns out of equilibrium
regions. The science of complexity may provide the platform to cross
disciplinary boundaries in seemgly disparate fields such as brain science and
economics. In this paper we take an integrative stance, fostering new insights
into the economic character of neural activity. Key concepts in brain science
like Hebbian learning and neural plasticity are revisited and elaborated,
inside a new theoretical framework, that is sensitive to the new ideas that
econophysics is proposing for financial markets. The objective here is to
precisely delineate common topics in both neural and economic science, within a
systemic outlook grounded in empirical basis that jolts the unification across
the science of complex systems.