Remember me

Register  |   Lost password?

Introduction to QuantLib Development - Intensive 3-day Training Course - September 10-12th, 2018 - Download Registration Form Here


arXiv logo for blog page

Mislearning from Censored Data: Gambler's Fallacy in a Search Problem. (arXiv:1803.08170v1 [q-fin.EC])

Thu, 22 Mar 2018 19:47:58 GMT

In the context of a sequential search problem, I explore large-generations
learning dynamics for agents who suffer from the "gambler's fallacy" - the
statistical bias of anticipating too much regression to the mean for
realizations of independent random events. Searchers are uncertain about search
pool qualities of different periods but infer these fundamentals from search
outcomes of the previous generation. Searchers' stopping decisions impose a
censoring effect on the data of their successors, as the values they would have
found in later periods had they kept searching remain unobserved. While
innocuous for rational agents, this censoring effect interacts with the
gambler's fallacy and creates a feedback loop between distorted stopping rules
and pessimistic beliefs about search pool qualities of later periods. In
general settings, the stopping rules used by different generations
monotonically converge to a steady-state rule that stops searching earlier than
optimal. In settings where true pool qualities increase over time - so there is
option value in rejecting above-average early draws - learning is monotonically
harmful and welfare strictly decreases across generations.