<![CDATA[MoneyScience: Quantitative Finance at arXiv's blog: How big should a Stress Shock be?. (arXiv:1905.10164v1 [q-fin.RM])]]>
http://www.moneyscience.com/pg/blog/arXiv/read/850835/how-big-should-a-stress-shock-be-arxiv190510164v1-qfinrm?view=rss
http://www.moneyscience.com/pg/blog/arXiv/read/850835/how-big-should-a-stress-shock-be-arxiv190510164v1-qfinrmSun, 26 May 2019 19:39:34 -0500
http://www.moneyscience.com/pg/blog/arXiv/read/850835/how-big-should-a-stress-shock-be-arxiv190510164v1-qfinrm
<![CDATA[How big should a Stress Shock be?. (arXiv:1905.10164v1 [q-fin.RM])]]>Stress shocks are often calculated as multiples of the standard deviation of
a history set. This paper investigates how many standard deviations are
required to guarantee that this shock exceeds any observation within the
history set, given the additional constraint of kurtosis. The results of this
analysis are then used to validate the shocks produced by some stress test
models, in particular that of Brace-Lauer-Rado. A secondary application of our
results is to investigate three known extensions of Chebyshev's Inequality
where the kurtosis is known. It is found that our results give a tighter bound
than the well-known inequalities.
]]>850835