<![CDATA[MoneyScience: Quantitative Finance at arXiv's blog: Convergence to the Mean Field Game Limit: A Case Study. (arXiv:1806.00817v2 [math.OC] UPDATED)]]>
http://www.moneyscience.com/pg/blog/arXiv/read/851795/convergence-to-the-mean-field-game-limit-a-case-study-arxiv180600817v2-mathoc-updated?view=rss
http://www.moneyscience.com/pg/blog/arXiv/read/851795/convergence-to-the-mean-field-game-limit-a-case-study-arxiv180600817v2-mathoc-updatedWed, 29 May 2019 19:50:24 -0500
http://www.moneyscience.com/pg/blog/arXiv/read/851795/convergence-to-the-mean-field-game-limit-a-case-study-arxiv180600817v2-mathoc-updated
<![CDATA[Convergence to the Mean Field Game Limit: A Case Study. (arXiv:1806.00817v2 [math.OC] UPDATED)]]>We study the convergence of Nash equilibria in a game of optimal stopping. If
the associated mean field game has a unique equilibrium, any sequence of
$n$-player equilibria converges to it as $n\to\infty$. However, both the finite
and infinite player versions of the game often admit multiple equilibria. We
show that mean field equilibria satisfying a transversality condition are limit
points of $n$-player equilibria, but we also exhibit a remarkable class of mean
field equilibria that are not limits, thus questioning their interpretation as
"large $n$" equilibria.
]]>851795