<![CDATA[MoneyScience: Quantitative Finance at arXiv's blog: Ergodicity-breaking reveals time optimal economic behavior in humans. (arXiv:1906.04652v1 [econ.GN])]]>
http://www.moneyscience.com/pg/blog/arXiv/read/856941/ergodicitybreaking-reveals-time-optimal-economic-behavior-in-humans-arxiv190604652v1-econgn?view=rss
http://www.moneyscience.com/pg/blog/arXiv/read/856941/ergodicitybreaking-reveals-time-optimal-economic-behavior-in-humans-arxiv190604652v1-econgnTue, 11 Jun 2019 23:03:33 -0500
http://www.moneyscience.com/pg/blog/arXiv/read/856941/ergodicitybreaking-reveals-time-optimal-economic-behavior-in-humans-arxiv190604652v1-econgn
<![CDATA[Ergodicity-breaking reveals time optimal economic behavior in humans. (arXiv:1906.04652v1 [econ.GN])]]>Ergodicity describes an equivalence between the expectation value and the
time average of observables. Applied to human behaviour, ergodic theory reveals
how individuals should tolerate risk in different environments. To optimise
wealth over time, agents should adapt their utility function according to the
dynamical setting they face. Linear utility is optimal for additive dynamics,
whereas logarithmic utility is optimal for multiplicative dynamics. Whether
humans approximate time optimal behavior across different dynamics is unknown.
Here we compare the effects of additive versus multiplicative gamble dynamics
on risky choice. We show that utility functions are modulated by gamble
dynamics in ways not explained by prevailing economic theory. Instead, as
predicted by time optimality, risk aversion increases under multiplicative
dynamics, distributing close to the values that maximise the time average
growth of wealth. We suggest that our findings motivate a need for explicitly
grounding theories of decision-making on ergodic considerations.
]]>856941