Remember me

Register  |   Lost password?


arXiv logo for blog page

Economics of disagreement -- financial intuition for the R\'enyi divergence. (arXiv:1811.08308v1 [q-fin.GN])

Tue, 20 Nov 2018 19:49:33 GMT

Lack of accurate intuition is often cited as a scientific challenge,
especially when interpreting probabilistic and statistical research. A popular
technique for developing statistical intuition involves imagining a game of
chance with well-defined financial outcomes. In 1956 Kelly used this technique
to propose an intuitive interpretation of relative entropy [1]. He considered a
growth-optimizing investor in a game with mutually exclusive outcomes (a "horse
race") and showed that the rate of return expected by such an investor is equal
to the relative entropy which measures disagreement between the investor's
believed probabilities and the official odds. Effectively, Kelly showed that a
growth-optimizing investor would expect on average to convert 1 bit of
additional information into a 100% return on investment. Notwithstanding the
mathematics, this interpretation has been vigorously criticized by Samuelson as
dangerous on the grounds that most people are not growth-optimizing [2,3]. Here
we show that a deeper connection between information and expected returns is in
fact true. Relative to the Kelly information benchmark, variation in people's
risk aversion does indeed cause a drop in expected returns. However, the amount
of the drop is also information-driven: it is proportional to the absolute
difference between the relative entropy and its celebrated generalization --
the R\'enyi divergence [4]. Given the widespread use of the R\'enyi divergence
in science and engineering, and because financial returns are much easier to
imagine, we expect our intuition to be useful in a broad range of fields.
Financial intuition might also be useful in its own right as an instrument for
raising financial support and accelerating the adoption of sound scientific