Remember me

Register  |   Lost password?


 

arXiv logo for blog page


Is Volatility Rough ?. (arXiv:1905.04852v1 [math.ST])

Mon, 13 May 2019 23:03:33 GMT

Rough volatility models are continuous time stochastic volatility models
where the volatility process is driven by a fractional Brownian motion with the
Hurst parameter less than half, and have attracted much attention since a
seminal paper titled "Volatility is rough" was posted on SSRN in 2014 claiming
that they explain a scaling property of realized variance time series. From our
point of view, the analysis is not satisfactory because the estimation error of
the latent volatility was not taken into account; we show by simulations that
it in fact results in a fake scaling property. Motivated by this preliminary
finding, we construct a quasi-likelihood estimator for a fractional stochastic
volatility model and apply it to realized variance time series to examine
whether the volatility is really rough. Our quasi-likelihood is based on a
central limit theorem for the realized volatility estimation error and a
Whittle-type approximation to the auto-covariance of the log-volatility
process. We prove the consistency of our estimator under high frequency
asymptotics, and examine by simulations the finite sample performance of our
estimator. Our empirical study suggests that the volatility is indeed rough;
actually it is even rougher than considered in the literature.