Remember me

Understanding Distributional Ambiguity via Non-robust Chance Constraint. (arXiv:1906.01981v1 [math.OC])

Wed, 05 Jun 2019 23:02:20 GMT

The choice of the ambiguity radius is critical when an investor uses the
distributionally robust approach to address the issue that the portfolio
optimization problem is sensitive to the uncertainties of the asset return
distribution. It cannot be set too large because the larger the size of the
ambiguity set the worse the portfolio return. It cannot be too small either;
otherwise, one loses the robust protection. This tradeoff demands a financial
understanding of the ambiguity set. In this paper, we propose a non-robust
interpretation of the distributionally robust optimization (DRO) problem. By
relating the impact of an ambiguity set to the impact of a non-robust chance
constraint, our interpretation allows investors to understand the size of the
ambiguity set through parameters that are directly linked to investment
performance. We first show that for general $\phi$-divergences, a DRO problem
is asymptotically equivalent to a class of mean-deviation problem, where the
ambiguity radius controls investor's risk preference. Based on this non-robust
reformulation, we then show that when a boundedness constraint is added to the
investment strategy, the DRO problem can be cast as a chance-constrained
optimization (CCO) problem without distributional uncertainties. If the
boundedness constraint is removed, the CCO problem is shown to perform
uniformly better than the DRO problem, irrespective of the radius of the
ambiguity set, the choice of the divergence measure, or the tail heaviness of
the center distribution. Our results apply to both the widely-used
Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence which requires the distribution of the
objective function to be exponentially bounded, as well as those more general
divergence measures which allow heavy tail ones such as student $t$ and
lognormal distributions.