Remember me

Register  |   Lost password?


 

arXiv logo for blog page


The cyclicality of loan loss provisions under three different accounting models: the United Kingdom, Spain, and Brazil. (arXiv:1907.07491v1 [econ.GN])

Wed, 17 Jul 2019 23:02:23 GMT

A controversy involving loan loss provisions in banks concerns their
relationship with the business cycle. While international accounting standards
for recognizing provisions (incurred loss model) would presumably be
pro-cyclical, accentuating the effects of the current economic cycle, an
alternative model, the expected loss model, has countercyclical
characteristics, acting as a buffer against economic imbalances caused by
expansionary or contractionary phases in the economy. In Brazil, a mixed
accounting model exists, whose behavior is not known to be pro-cyclical or
countercyclical. The aim of this research is to analyze the behavior of these
accounting models in relation to the business cycle, using an econometric model
consisting of financial and macroeconomic variables. The study allowed us to
identify the impact of credit risk behavior, earnings management, capital
management, Gross Domestic Product (GDP) behavior, and the behavior of the
unemployment rate on provisions in countries that use different accounting
models. Data from commercial banks in the United Kingdom (incurred loss), in
Spain (expected loss), and in Brazil (mixed model) were used, covering the
period from 2001 to 2012. Despite the accounting models of the three countries
being formed by very different rules regarding possible effects on the business
cycles, the results revealed a pro-cyclical behavior of provisions in each
country, indicating that when GDP grows, provisions tend to fall and vice
versa. The results also revealed other factors influencing the behavior of loan
loss provisions, such as earning management.