Remember me

Register  |   Lost password?


arXiv logo for blog page

A procedure for loss-optimising default definitions across simulated credit risk scenarios. (arXiv:1907.12615v1 [q-fin.RM])

Tue, 30 Jul 2019 23:02:29 GMT

A new procedure is presented for the objective comparison and evaluation of
default definitions. This allows the lender to find a default threshold at
which the financial loss of a loan portfolio is minimised, in accordance with
Basel II. Alternative delinquency measures, other than simply measuring
payments in arrears, can also be evaluated using this optimisation procedure.
Furthermore, a simulation study is performed in testing the procedure from
`first principles' across a wide range of credit risk scenarios. Specifically,
three probabilistic techniques are used to generate cash flows, while the
parameters of each are varied, as part of the simulation study. The results
show that loss minima can exist for a select range of credit risk profiles,
which suggests that the loss optimisation of default thresholds can become a
viable practice. The default decision is therefore framed anew as an
optimisation problem in choosing a default threshold that is neither too early
nor too late in loan life. These results also challenges current practices
wherein default is pragmatically defined as `90 days past due', with little
objective evidence for its overall suitability or financial impact, at least
beyond flawed roll rate analyses or a regulator's decree.