Remember me

Register  |   Lost password?


arXiv logo for blog page

Revenue Sharing in the Internet: A Moral Hazard Approach and a Net-neutrality Perspective. (arXiv:1908.09580v1 [econ.GN])

Mon, 26 Aug 2019 23:01:57 GMT

Revenue sharing contracts between Content Providers (CPs) and Internet
Service Providers (ISPs) can act as leverage for enhancing the infrastructure
of the Internet. ISPs can be incentivized to make investments in network
infrastructure that improve Quality of Service (QoS) for users if attractive
contracts are negotiated between them and CPs. The idea here is that part of
the net profit gained by CPs are given to ISPs to invest in the network. The
Moral Hazard economic framework is used to model such an interaction, in which
a principal determines a contract, and an agent reacts by adapting her effort.
In our setting, several competitive CPs interact through one common ISP. Two
cases are studied: (i) the ISP differentiates between the CPs and makes a
(potentially) different investment to improve the QoS of each CP, and (ii) the
ISP does not differentiate between CPs and makes a common investment for both.
The last scenario can be viewed as \emph{network neutral behavior} on the part
of the ISP. We analyse the optimal contracts and show that the CP that can
better monetize its demand always prefers the non-neutral regime.
Interestingly, ISP revenue, as well as social utility, are also found to be
higher under the non-neutral regime.